Amended Bill to Prohibit Mask Mandates isn’t Perfect, but it’s Better Than Nothing

Senator Jessica Bell (R - District 33) proposes an amendment to HB 1323. (Photo via screenshot.)

Yesterday, on a vote of 30-17, the North Dakota Senate did something many of us once thought near impossible— they passed a bill prohibiting the state from implementing mask mandates. In my opinion, House Bill 1323 — which has gained national attention — illustrates the possibilities when a well-organized grassroots movement gets behind something.

Not everyone is happy about its passage though. For example, a certain political blogger — who fancies himself as “North Dakota’s Most Popular and Influential” — is fuming over the issue. In fact, he called the bill “cloyingly stupid” and supporters of it a “noisy minority”. He’s calling on Governor Doug Burgum to veto it if it hits his desk. His tirade reminded me of the following YouTube video:

Yet, the aforementioned blogger isn’t the only one airing his grievances in the aftermath of yesterday’s vote. A number of proponents of the original bill aren’t happy either. Yes, you read that right— there’s supporters who are pretty ticked off. And, in fact, some of them have taken to social media to say as much.

What’s the problem? The bill got amended on the Senate floor.

This wasn’t exactly a surprise. In fact, Rep. Jeff Hoverson (R – District 3) — who is also the bill’s primary sponsor — told supporters at a rally the day before that this was likely to happen.

What did the amendment do? It’s pretty simple actually. In the original language, the prohibition on mask mandates would have applied to state and local governments both. But Senator Jessica Bell (R – District 33) — formerly Jessica Unruh — proposed a floor amendment that stripped out the local part of it. And it was adopted.

With this change, the Senate’s version of HB 1323 means that if the bill becomes law in its current form, it will only restrict a “statewide elected official or the state health officer” from mandating the use of “a face mask, face shield, or other face covering.” In other words, local governments (including school boards) can do so in the name of “local control”.

That’s not all though. There could be other implications that go with the amendment. For example, could state and local department heads require masks of those who work in or enter their offices? I see nothing prohibiting it.

Yet, in spite of these apparent realities, I’d argue that even the current bill is still better than nothing. Think of it. Not all communities in our state are led by people who support mandates. What does an all or nothing mentality do for them? Especially when a refusal to amend the bill would have got them nothing and left them subject to future state-wide mandates.

Without the amendment to HB 1323, it was dead in the water. And legislators who supported the bill knew it. That’s why you didn’t hear any opposition to the amendment on the floor.

Believe me, I understand if there’s some disappointment from supporters of the original legislation. But I don’t think the perceived outrage from some of them is necessary. After all, if HB 1323 becomes law, no one can issue a state-wide mask mandate anymore. If you’re anti-mandate, that should be a win— even if it’s not everything you wanted in the first place.

At this point, time would be better spent getting this thing through the House again and onto Governor Doug Burgum’s desk for his signature. Because believe me, there’s plenty of time for it to get screwed up. And Burgum may just veto it anyhow. Then all would definitely be for naught.

And that wouldn’t be a win— at all.

PLEASE LIKE & SHARE!

Sources:

  1. North Dakota Bill Actions: HB 1323 (nd.gov)
  2. North Dakota Bill Versions: HB 1323 (nd.gov)
  3. Please Immediately Veto the Very Stupid Ban on Mask Mandates – Say Anything (sayanythingblog.com)
  4. House Bill No. 1323 HOUSE BILL NO. 1323 with Senate Amendments – Sixty-seventh Legislative Assembly of North Dakota – LC Number 21.0189.03000
Facebook Comments

Donate to The Minuteman Blog

Your donations are greatly appreciated. Thank You.


  • Bitcoin
  • Ethereum
  • Litecoin
Scan to Donate Bitcoin to 36qWjsnKSfQRUbDDc5XMqwkvaJZQuLBqwR

Donate Bitcoin to this address

Scan the QR code or copy the address below into your wallet to send some Bitcoin

Scan to Donate Ethereum to 0x9966c92Bb9534E919af2524234594ff428D7D161

Donate Ethereum to this address

Scan the QR code or copy the address below into your wallet to send some Ethereum

Scan to Donate Litecoin to MNMSABX9BVxgPj1WZ2Z7kj8bzqzYaFU5FG

Donate Litecoin to this address

Scan the QR code or copy the address below into your wallet to send some Litecoin


About T. Arthur Mason 859 Articles
T. Arthur Mason is a native North Dakotan who has spent nearly all of his life in the Peace Garden State. As the third of four children in Western North Dakota, Mason grew to appreciate family and the outdoors. Some of his fondest memories are annual deer hunts with family and friends. In his early teenage years, faith became a central part of T. Arthur Mason's life. He and the majority of his family attend church together on a weekly basis and find this a fulfilling aspect of their lives. Through the influence of his father, T. Arthur Mason became intrigued with politics. As a boy, he attended political events with his father and enjoyed the friendships that resulted as a byproduct of those political associations. As Mason grew older, he became convinced that the quote often attributed to Thomas Jefferson was true, "That government is best which governs least." Today, T. Arthur Mason enjoys time with his wife and children, an occasional hunt, and an increasingly active life on the political scene. This blog is the fulfillment of a dream to design a web site in the realm of politics and to advocate for the principles of Liberty and constitutionally limited government. On behalf of all those that contribute to The Minuteman, we hope you enjoy your time on the site and will share the message with others.